Perceived Barriers of Tuberculosis Case Notification among Private Practitioners in Central Karnataka

Satish  Ghatage; Anurupa  MS; Swathi  Aithal

doi:10.5455/njcm.20211223103344

Authors

Satish Ghatage Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere
Anurupa MS Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere
Swathi Aithal Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davangere

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/njcm.20211223103344

Keywords:

Tuberculosis, Private Practitioner, Case Notification, Diagnosis

Abstract

Background: India is the highest tuberculosis (TB) burden country in the world accounting for almost one-fourth of the global cases and deaths as per the global TB report 2021. There are evidences suggesting that private practitioners (PPs) in India are not equipped with sufficient knowledge to carry out proper management of TB patients and certain barriers in TB case notification. So the present study is under taken to explore the perceived barriers for TB case notification from private practitioners.

Methodology: In-depth interview, qualitative research was done with the PPs who diagnosed and treated TB patients in 2018 but not notified to district TB centre. PPs were selected for in-depth interview by simple random sampling method. In-depth interview were stopped based on the saturation of data. Study was conducted from July-December 2018.

Results: In-depth interview were conducted with 28 private practitioners. Perceived barriers for notification of TB cases by private practitioners were few misconceptions, patient’s confidentiality and stigma, lack of co-ordination between public and private sector and lack of simplified mechanism for TB notification.

Conclusion: Private practitioners are the main stake holders in moving the country toward TB elimination so addressing their challenges is the need of the hour. Trust building and reorientation of private practitioners will address the major misconceptions about the TB case notification.

References

Government of India. TB India 2020 National tb elimination programme annual status report. [Online]. 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 25];1-292. Available from: URL: https://tbcindia.gov.in/ showfile.php?lid=3538

Park K. Park’s text book of preventive and social medicine. 24th ed. Jabalpur: M/s Banarisdas Bhanot publisher, 2017. p. 504-12.

Bronner Murrison L, Ananthakrishnan R, Swaminathan A, Au-guesteen S, Krishnan N, Pai M et al. How do patients access the private sector in Chennai, India? An evaluation of delays in tu-berculosis diagnosis. The International Journal of Tuberculo-sis and Lung Disease. 2016 Apr 1;20(4):544-51.

Satyanarayana S, Nair SA, Chadha SS, Shivashankar R, Sharma G, Yadav S et al. From where are tuberculosis patients access-ing treatment in India? Results from a cross-sectional community based survey of 30 districts. PloS one. 2011 Sep 2;6(9):e24160.

Uplekar MW, Rangan S. Private doctors and tuberculosis con-trol in India. Tubercle and lung disease. 1993 Oct 1;74(5):332-7.

Uplekar M, Juvekar S, Morankar S, Rangan S, Nunn P. Tubercu-losis patients and practitioners in private clinics in India. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 1998 Apr 1;2(4):324-9.

Hazarika I. Role of private sector in providing tuberculosis care: evidence from a population-based survey in India. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;3(1):19-24.

Sharma VM. Management of Tuberculosis-The Need to Enforce Proper Treatment Guidelines among Private Practitioners in India. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences. 2012 Jan 15;10(4):1-2.

TB Notification Module – Nikshay: User Manual. [Online]. 2012 [cited 2021 Oct 19];[5 screens]. Available from: URL:http:// ori-gin.searo.who.int/india/tuberculosis/topic/TB_Notification_Module_Nikshay_User_manual.pdf

In-Depth Interviews: Data Collection Advantages and Disad-vantages. [Online]. 2016 2012 [cited 2021 Oct 20];[2 screens]. Available from: URL:https://www.cfrinc.net/cfrblog/in-depth-interviewing

Siddaiah A, Ahmed MN, Kumar AM, D’Souza G, Wilkinson E, Maung TM, Rodrigues R. Tuberculosis notification in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in South India: a mixed-methods study. BMJ open. 2019 Feb 1;9(2):e023910.

Thomas BE, Velayutham B, Thiruvengadam K, Nair D, Barman SB, Jayabal L, Ovung S et al. Perceptions of private medical practitioners on tuberculosis notification: A study from Chennai, South India. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147579.

Yeole RD, Khillare K, Chadha VK, Lo T, Kumar AM. Tuberculo-sis case notification by private practitioners in Pune, India: how well are we doing?. Public health action. 2015 Sep 21; 5(3):173-9.

Philip S, Isaakidis P, Sagili KD, Meharunnisa A, Mrithyunjayan S, Kumar AM. “They know, they agree, but they don’t do”-the paradox of tuberculosis case notification by private practi-tioners in Alappuzha District, Kerala, India. PloS one. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0123286

Chadha SS, Nagaraja SB, Trivedi A, Satapathy S, Devendrappa NM, Sagili KD. Mandatory TB notification in Mysore city, India: Have we heard the private practitioner’s plea?. BMC health services research. 2017 Dec;17(1):1.

Sulis G, Pai M. Missing tuberculosis patients in the private sector: Business as usual will not deliver results. Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(2):80.

Dutta A, Pattanaik S, Choudhury R, Nanda P, Sahu S, Panigrahi R, Padhi BK, Sahoo KC, Mishra PR, Panigrahi P, Lekharu D. Im-pact of involvement of non-formal health providers on TB case notification among migrant slum-dwelling populations in Odisha, India. Plos one. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0196.