Reasons Behind Incomplete Immunization: A Cross Sectional Study at Urban Health Centre of Government Medical College, Aurangabad

Authors

  • Abhijeet Ingale GMC, Aurangabad
  • Dixit JV GMC, Aurangabad
  • Deven Deshpande GMC, Aurangabad

Keywords:

Incomplete immunization, Chief reasons, Sub reasons, UHTC, Aurangabad

Abstract

Background: Primary immunization in India is carried out to protect all children against six vaccine preventable diseases; still many children don’t receive vaccination at proper age.

Objective: To find out reasons for incomplete primary immunization under 2 year children.

Material and Method: It was a cross sectional study conducted in field practice area Urban Health Training Centre Government Medical College Aurangabad Maharashtra during Nov to Dec 2011. A house to house survey carried out to find reasons behind incomplete immunization by a group of undergraduate doctors posted at field practice area of Urban Health Centre.

Results: 62.24% children received complete immunization till required for their age at proper time according to National immunization schedule while 37.76% children were incompletely immunized. Reasons behind incomplete immunisation were 60.30% children had obstacles 34.35% children lack of motivation & 5.35% children lack of information. Sub reasons behind lack of motivation were ignorance in 82.22% & false beliefs in 17.78%.Sub reasons behind Obstacles were ill health of children in 74.68%, mother and child were out of station in 17.72 % & non availability of the vaccine in 7.60 %.

Conclusion: Incomplete immunisation is a major problem of primary immunisation in children. Four out of ten children are incompletely immunised. Chief reasons behind irregularity are obstacles, lack of motivation and lack of information.Present study speak about current immunization status of children and the reasons behind incomplete immunization; It not only gives recommendation and suggestions but also sends a positive message for vaccination in the society.

References

World Health Organization. The “high-risk” ap-proach: the WHO recommended strategy to accelerate elimination of neonatal tetanus. Wkly Epidemiology Rec 1996; 71:33-36.

Daniel A. Salmon , Jason W. Sapsin, JD, MPH, Stephen Teret, Public Health and the Politics of School Immunization Requirements in USA 2002;40:849–66.

Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Immunization information system progress: United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:1156-57.

Kane, M. Lasher, H. “The case for childhood immun-ization”.1st edition Seattle WA.Path publications 2002;10-11.

Frenkel, L.D. Nielsen, K. “Immunization issues for the 21st century. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunology 2003; 90(6): Suppl 3:45-52.

Ram F., B. Paswan L. Ladu Singh P. N. Mari Bhat Reproductive and Child Health District Level House-hold Survey (DLHS-3) Maharashtra- 110 011 April, 2010.

Deivanayagam N, Nedunchelian K, Mala N, Ashok T.P, Ratnam S.R , Shaffi Ahmed S. Missed opportuni-ty for immunisation in children under 2 years attend-ing an urban teaching hospital ; Indian Pediatrics ;Jan 1995:32:52-53.

Ram F., B. Paswan L. Ladu Singh P. N. Mari Bhat Reproductive and Child Health District Level House-hold Survey (DLHS-3) India- 110 011 April, 2010.

Evaluation of Immunisation Programme at Hydera-bad, Andhra Pradesh, India 2006. Availa-bleat:http://www.elitepco.com.tw/tephinet2007taiwan/images/presentationdownload/oral presenta-tion_PDF/OP23.pdf.Accessed 8 may 2012.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Ingale A, Dixit JV, Deshpande D. Reasons Behind Incomplete Immunization: A Cross Sectional Study at Urban Health Centre of Government Medical College, Aurangabad. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2013 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 3];4(02):353-6. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1531

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles