Covid-19 Hazard Index: A Spatiotemporal Risk Forecast Tool

Manvendra Singh Rathore; Samudyatha UC; JK Kosambiya

doi:10.55489/njcm.130720221346

Authors

Manvendra Singh Rathore Government Medical College, Surat
Samudyatha UC Sri Devraj Urs Medical, College, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka
JK Kosambiya Government Medical College, Surat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.130720221346

Keywords:

Geomapping, Spatial analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Weekly Growth rate, Population density, COVID19 vaccine coverage

Abstract

Background: In a given geographic region, risk of new cases of COVID19 are driven by internal factors such as agent, host and environment characteristics, as well as external factors, such as population mobility and cross border transmission of disease. COVID19 control measures are best implemented when local governments and health teams are well aware of these internal and external risks. These risks are dynamic in nature and hence need to be reviewed at regular intervals. Objective: To develop a composite spatiotemporal Hazard Index comprising of three factors – presence of susceptible population, population density and presence of active cases with corresponding growth rates, to rank areas within an administrative boundary by their fortnightly risk of active COVID19 cases.

Methods: Using Principal Component Analysis, the weights of each of these factors were determined and applied to transformed values of factors in the districts of Gujarat state for months of January to July 2021. Hazard Index thus obtained was used to rank the districts.

Results: Spearman correlation between the Hazard Index and number of active cases 15 days later was moderate and significant (p<0.01) throughout the study period.

Conclusion: Hazard Index can predict Districts at highest risk of active cases in the given time period. These districts with high Hazard Index would require different control measures, depending on the factor that resulted in higher index value.

References

Chakraborty C, Ranjan A, Bhattacharya M, Agoramoorthy G, Lee S-S. The current second wave and COVID-19 vaccination status in India. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;(Online ahead of print). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.05.018 PMid:34022371 PMCid:PMC8133819

Wikimedia Cloud Services. GeoHack-Gujarat [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?pagename=Gujarat&params=23_13_N_72_41_E_region:IN-GJ_type:city(60439692)

Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India. Census of India 2011 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/districtlist/gujarat.html

Government of India. myGov [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.mygov.in/covid-19

Pierce JB, Harrington K, Mccabe ME, Petito LC, Kershaw KN, Pool LR, et al. Racial/ethnic minority and neighborhood disadvantage leads to disproportionate mortality burden and years of potential life lost due to COVID-19 in Chicago, Illinois. Health and Place. 2021;68(February). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102540 PMid:33647635 PMCid:PMC7894217

Subramanian S V., Karlsson O, Zhang W, Kim R. Geo-mapping of COVID-19 Risk Correlates Across Districts and Parliamentary Constituencies in India. Harvard Data Science Review. 2020;doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.68bb12e4

Ramírez IJ, Lee J. COVID-19 emergence and social and health determinants in Colorado: A rapid spatial analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(11):1-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113856 PMid:32485854 PMCid:PMC7312929

QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project; 2019.

COVID19 India [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.covid19india.org

Dharmawardena JSNP, Thattil RO, Samita S. Adjusting variables in constructing composite indices by using principal component analysis: illustrated by Colombo district data. Tropical Agricultural Research. 2016;27(1):95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v27i1.8157

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, ver 23. Armonk, N.Y: IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA; 2015. p. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

International Institute of Population Sciences. Census of India 2001 Migration Tables. In Mumbai; 2001. p. 15.

Elson R, Davies TM, Lake IR, Vivancos R, Blomquist PB, Charlett A, et al. The spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 infection in England between January and June 2020. Epidemiology and infection. 2021;149(June 2020):e73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000534 PMid:33678199 PMCid:PMC7985908

Rubin D, Huang J, Fisher BT, Gasparrini A, Tam V, Song L, et al. Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature With the Instantaneous Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 in Counties Across the United States. JAMA network open [Internet]. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016099-e2016099. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16099 PMid:32701162 PMCid:PMC7378754

Monod M, Blenkinsop A, Xi X, Hebert D, Bershan S, Tietze S, et al. Age groups that sustain resurging COVID-19 epidemics in the United States. Science. 2021;371(6536). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8372 PMid:33531384 PMCid:PMC8101272

Gémes K, Talbäck M, Modig K, Ahlbom A, Berglund A, Feychting M, et al. Burden and prevalence of prognostic factors for severe COVID-19 in Sweden. European Journal of Epidemiology [Internet]. 2020;35(5):401-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00646-z PMid:32424571 PMCid:PMC7233678