Study Of Congenital Malformation in Neonates Born at Tertiary Care Hospital
Keywords:
Congenital malformation, neonate, musculoskeletal system, risk factorsAbstract
Introduction: Congenital malformations are major contributors of neonatal mortality or lifelong disability. Early diagnosis and early surgical treatment when required can prevent neonatal deaths and help for better survival.
Method: An observational prospective study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital. All neonates delivered from 1st July, 2007 to August, 2009 including still borns were included in the study. Detailed maternal history was taken, complete clinical examination and necessary investigations were carried out to look for congenital malformations. Babies were followed up till one week of life. Data was recorded and analysed with standard statistical software.
Results: Out of 6652 babies, 113 (1.69%) babies were diagnosed having congenital malformations. Amongst them, 98 were live births and 15 were still borns. Out of 113 babies, 34 babies (30.04%) were diagnosed antenatally. CNS malformations were the most common to be antenatally diagnosed. At the end of first week of follow up, 22 out of 98(22.44%) expired, 73(74.48%) survived and 3(3.06%) were lost in follow up.
Conclusion: Incidence of congenital malformations was significantly high in still born babies. Factors like prematurity, low birth weight, birth order four or more, liquor abnormalities and maternal age more than 35 years were found to carry higher risk for congenital malformations. Musculoskeletal system was most commonly affected. Congenital talipesequinovarus was the commonest malformation.
References
Michele C walsh, Fanaroff and martin's neonatal peri-natal medicine,9th edition, Elseveir, Mosby missouri 2010, 29, 531.
Smith; Recognizable patterning of human malfor-mation kennethlyons jones, Elseveirsaunders, phila-delphia2004 ,1, 2.
K.Park (MBBS, MS), Park textbook of preventive and social medicine, 22 nd edition, Bhanot publisher, Jab-alpur India, 2013. 523.
Kliegman, Stathon, Behrman, Nelson text book of pediatrics ,19th edition, 2012, ElseveirSaundey, phil-adelphia, pg 0629
B. Vishnu, Bhat ,Lokeshbabu et al ., Congenital mal-formation at birth. A prospective study from south India. Indian J. Pediatrics 1998; 65; 873-878.
Arjunsingh and Ravindra Gupta, Pattern of anomaly in new born; A hospital based prospective study ,J.K.science vol.11, Jan-March 2009. 34-36.
AmanTaskade, Krishna, Vilhelar at el. Congenital malformation at birth in central India, A rural medi-cal college based data. Indian Journal of human ge-netics 2010. Sep-Dec. 16.159-163.
N groven . Congenital malformation in Shimbi, Indian J. pediatrics 2000; 67, 240-250.
Patel Z. M., Adhia R.A., Birth defect survillance study Indian J. Pediatrics Volume 72 June 2005; 489-490.
Chaturvedi P, Banerjee K. S, An epidermiologcal study of congenital malformation in newborn, Indian Journal Pediatrics 1993; 60, 645-653.
Swain S, Agrawal A, Bhatia B.D., Congenital mal-formation at birth, Indian Pediatrics 1994, 31, 1187-1191.
Dutta V Chaturvedi P. Congenital malformation in rural Maharashtra, Indian paediatrics 2000; 37: 998-1000
Grandjean H, Haroque D et al, The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the eurofetus of pregancies in the eurofetus study, Am j. ObstractGynecol 1999:181;446-454.
Carol M rumack, Stephanic Wilson at el.diagnostic ultrasound. 4th edition, Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia. 2011. 28; 1056-1057.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.