Perception Regarding Hazards of Plastics Usage and Effectiveness of Plastic Ban in Rural Tamil Nadu

Raja  Danasekaran; Buvnesh Kumar M; T K  Raja; A Y Nirupama; U Sharath

doi:10.5455/njcm.20190430061950

Authors

Raja Danasekaran Chettinad Hospital & Research Insti-tute, Chettinad Academy of research & Education, Chennai
Buvnesh Kumar M Chettinad Hospital & Research Insti-tute, Chettinad Academy of research & Education, Chennai
T K Raja Chettinad Hospital & Research Insti-tute, Chettinad Academy of research & Education, Chennai
A Y Nirupama Chettinad Hospital & Research Insti-tute, Chettinad Academy of research & Education, Chennai
U Sharath Chettinad Hospital & Research Insti-tute, Chettinad Academy of research & Education, Chennai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/njcm.20190430061950

Keywords:

Plastics, environment, pollution, ban, bio-degradable

Abstract

Background: Plastics have become part of our modern lives and the amount of plastics produced in this decade equals the amount produced in the last century. Unless we control the production and usage of these plastics, the consequences will be drastic. The study was planned to find the perception regarding the hazards of plastics and also to assess the effectiveness of the plastic ban imposed in Tamil Nadu state.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult participants in a rural area (Poonjeri village) of Kanchipuram district in Tamil Nadu. Details regarding basic socio-demography, perception regarding plastics and practices related to plastic ban were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire.

Results: The study included 122 participants of which 23.8% were illiterates and 59.8% were unskilled workers. Major usage form of plastics was plastic covers and they were of the opinion that plastics can lead to cancer, diseases, environmental pollution, etc. 95.1% were aware of the plastic ban and there was difference in awareness about the banned items. Many have stopped using the banned plastics, but 35% were still using plastics for food packing, etc. Plastic wastes were dumped (33.62%) or burnt (21.55%), apart from disposal by local bodies.

Conclusion: Even though the awareness about the plastic ban is high among the population, the usage of banned materials is still there. Adequate number of alternatives to be made available and awareness to be created about the same.

References

Kumar P. Role of Plastics on Human Health. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2018; 85:384–9.

Rustagi N, Pradhan SK, Singh R. Public health impact of plastics: An overview. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2011;15(3):100–103.

Halden RU. Plastics and Health Risks. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31(1):179–94.

An Indian consumes 11kg plastic every year and an average American 109kg [Internet]. Down To Earth. [cited 2019Apr23].

Indian states' implementation of plastic ban a mixed bag [Internet]. Down To Earth. [cited 2019Apr23]. Available from: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/waste/ in-dian-states-implementation-of-plastic-ban-a-mixed-bag-62664.

Asmuni S, Hussin NB, Khalili JM, Zain ZM. Public Partici-pation and Effectiveness of the no Plastic Bag Day Program in Malaysia. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2015;168:328–40.

Wagner TP. Reducing single-use plastic shopping bags in the USA. Waste Manag. 2017; 70:3–12.

North EJ, Halden RU. Plastics and environmental health: the road ahead. Rev Environ Health. 2013;28(1):1–8.

Thompson RC, Moore CJ, vom Saal FS, Swan SH. Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1526):2153–2166.

Song JH, Murphy RJ, Narayan R, Davies GB. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1526):2127–2139.