Caesarean Section Delivery in India: A Comparative Assessment of Geographical Variability Using Nationally Representative Survey Factsheet Data

Brajaraj Tripathy; Ayusman  jena; Anuj Kumar Pandey; Sidharth Sekhar  Mishra; Chhandasri  Mishra

doi:10.55489/njcm.140420232650

Authors

Brajaraj Tripathy International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi, India
Ayusman jena International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi, India
Anuj Kumar Pandey International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi, India
Sidharth Sekhar Mishra International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi, India
Chhandasri Mishra International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.140420232650

Keywords:

Cesarean section, C-section, Geographic variation, emergency/elective c-section

Abstract

Background: In line with global trends, India has witnessed a sharp rise in C-section (CS) deliveries, especially in the private sector.

Methodology: Study attempts to explore change in CS delivery in India at national, regional and State/UT levels. We have used factsheet data from the most recent nationally representative survey data i.e., NFHS to examine changes in private and public healthcare facilities, and to determine a difference in rural and urban in CS deliveries.

Results: The CS rate has increased from 17.2% to 21.5% in 2019-21. CS was more than twice (40.9%) amongst the private healthcare facilities during the fourth round of NFHS which has shown a considerable increase during the fifth round of NFHS (47.4%). There is equal distribution (12.8% during 2015-16 to 17.6% in 2019-21 in rural areas v/s 28.2% during 2015-16 to 32.3% in 2019-21in urban areas) of CS deliveries amongst the rural and urban areas to the total deliveries.

Conclusion: Study found that with every one in five deliveries being caesarean, the figure is significantly high as per the recommended cut off by WHO. Thus, it is essential to explore factors regarding emergency or elective caesarean section and to understand if the health facilities are following the recommended protocols for performing CS deliveries.

References

C-section - Mayo Clinic [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/c-section/about/pac-20393655

Essendi H, Mills S, Fotso J-C. Barriers to formal emergency obstetric care services' utilization. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med. 2011 Jun;88 Suppl 2:S356-369. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9481-1 PMid:20700769 PMCid:PMC3132235

Organization WH. Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care: A Handbook. World Health Organization; 2009. 162 p.

WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7 PMid:30322584

Prakash KC, Neupane S. Cesarean deliveries among Nepalese mothers: changes over time 2001-2011 and determinants. Arch Gyne-col Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):421-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2976-8 PMid:23900728

Gibbons L, Belizán J, Lauer J, Betrán A, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unneces-sary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage HEALTH SYSTEMS FINANCING. World Health Rep 2010. 2010 Jan 1;30.

Roy A, Paul P, Chouhan P, Rahaman M, Kapasia N. Geographical variability and factors associated with caesarean section delivery in India: a comparative assessment of Bihar and Tamil Nadu. BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;21:1715. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11750-4 PMid:34548059 PMCid:PMC8456626

Khan MN, Islam MM, Shariff AA, Alam MM, Rahman MM. Socio-demographic predictors and average annual rates of caesarean sec-tion in Bangladesh between 2004 and 2014. PloS One. 2017;12(5):e0177579. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177579 PMid:28493956 PMCid:PMC5426770

Amjad A, Amjad U, Zakar R, Usman A, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the Demographic and Health Survey, 2012-13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):113. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1743-z PMid:29685129 PMCid:PMC5914047

National Family Health Survey [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/

Utilisation, equity and determinants of full antenatal care in India: analysis from the National Family Health Survey 4 | BMC Preg-nancy and Childbirth | Full Text [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2473-6

Puram - SAMPLE REGISTRATION SYSTEM.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/MMR%20Bulletin%202016-18.pdf

Montgomery AL, Ram U, Kumar R, Jha P, Million Death Study Collaborators. Maternal mortality in India: causes and healthcare ser-vice use based on a nationally representative survey. PloS One. 2014;9(1):e83331. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083331 PMid:24454701 PMCid:PMC3893075

Dankwah E, Kirychuk S, Zeng W, Feng C, Farag M. Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data. Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 25;18(1):162. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1063-6 PMid:31653255 PMCid:PMC6814993

High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India | BMC Public Health | Full Text [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-018-5533-3

Mishra US, Ramanathan M. Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy Plan. 2002 Mar;17(1):90-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/17.1.90 PMid:11861590

Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016 | Global Health | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2728617

Prevalence and determinants of voluntary caesarean deliveries and socioeconomic inequalities in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey (2015-16) - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://cegh.net/article/S2213-3984(19)30370-7/fulltext

National Family Health Survey [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 21]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/

Census of India: Sample Registration [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 21]. Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/Vital_Statistics/SRS/Sample_Registration_System.aspx

Panda BK, Nayak I, Mishra US. Determinant of inequality in cesarean delivery in India: A decomposition analysis. Health Care Wom-en Int [Internet]. 2020 Jul 2 [cited 2022 Jan 12];41(7):817-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1711757 PMid:31928373

Bhatia M, Banerjee K, Dixit P, Dwivedi LK. Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2020 Aug 28 [cited 2022 Jan 12];3(8):e2015022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022 PMid:32857148 PMCid:PMC7455857

47.4% babies born in private sector via C-section, far above 14.3% in govt facilities, NFHS shows [Internet]. ThePrint. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 13]. Available from: https://theprint.in/india/21-5-of-all-births-in-india-are-through-c-section-far-above-who-ideal-of-10-15-shows-nfhs/771710/

Lee H-Y, Kim R, Oh J, Subramanian SV. Association between the type of provider and Cesarean section delivery in India: A socioeco-nomic analysis of the National Family Health Surveys 1999, 2006, 2016. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2021 Mar 8 [cited 2022 Jan 13];16(3):e0248283. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248283 PMid:33684180 PMCid:PMC7939292

Roy A, Paul P, Chouhan P, Rahaman M, Kapasia N. Geographical variability and factors associated with caesarean section delivery in India: a comparative assessment of Bihar and Tamil Nadu. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Sep 21 [cited 2022 Jan 13];21(1):1715. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11750-4 PMid:34548059 PMCid:PMC8456626

Guilmoto CZ, Dumont A. Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2019 Mar 22 [cited 2022 Jan 14];2(3):e190526. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0526 PMid:30901040 PMCid:PMC6583298

Swaddle T. Nowhere in India Are C-Section Rates What They Should Be [Internet]. The Swaddle. 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 14]. Available from: https://theswaddle.com/nowhere-in-india-are-cesarean-birth-rates-what-they-should-be/

Sengupta A, Sabastin Sagayam M, Reja T. Increasing trend of C-section deliveries in India: A comparative analysis between southern states and rest of India. Sex Reprod Healthc [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2022 Jan 14];28:100608. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100608 PMid:33652351

Gibbons L, Belizán J, Lauer J, Betrán A, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unneces-sary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage HEALTH SYSTEMS FINANCING. World Health Rep 2010. 2010 Jan 1;30.