Evaluation Of Intravenous Propofol Anesthesia and Traditional Inhalational Anesthesia in Mastoid Surgery

Authors

  • Nayna K Chavda Kesar SAL Medical College and Research Institute, Ahmedabad
  • Dinesh Thakur Kesar SAL Medical College and Research Institute, Ahmedabad
  • Mihir Goswami Kesar SAL Medical College and Research Institute, Ahmedabad
  • Yogesh Chauhan Kesar SAL Medical College and Research Institute, Ahmedabad
  • Himanshu Shah Kesar SAL Medical College and Research Institute, Ahmedabad

Keywords:

INTRAVENOUS, PROPOFOL, INHALATIONAL, MASTOID SURGERY

Abstract

The total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) due to advent of Propofol for both induction and continuous intravenous maintenance of anesthesia avoids local & global pollution as seen in inhalation anesthestic agents1 and allows rapid recovery of consciousness.2 The intravenous anesthesia is the latest concept of balanced anesthesia, which obviates in need for inhalational agents3 like halothane & isoflurane. Propofol is good for both induction and maintenance of Anesthetic depth and also less of health hazards as occur in inhalational agents.4 Studies have shown that propofol maintain cerebral and spinal cord blood flow autoregulation in experimental animals5 and abolishes the metabolic endocrine stress reaction better than inhalational agents.

References

O’ Hare B, Fitzpatrick GJ. General Anaesthesis and Environment. In Med. J. 1994; 87(5): 149-50

Price ML, Walmsley A. Swaine, et al. Comparison of total intravenous anaesthetic technique using enflurane for day care surgery. Anaesthesia 1988; 43(Suppl); 84-7

Joseph S. Lallon, Geraid Edelist Editorial. Total intravenous anaesthesia. Can J. Anaesth. 1990; 37:3: 279-81

Yagiela JA. Health hazards and N2O: a time for reappraisal. Anaesth Prog 1991; 38 (1); 1-11

Wermer, C, Hoffman, W, Kochs, E, Schulte am Esch, J, Albrecht, F. The effects of propofol on cerebral and spinal cord blood flow in rats. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 971-975

Schricker, T., Lattermann, R., Schreiber, M., Geisser, W., Georgieff, M. and Radermacher, P. The hyperglycaemic response to surgery; pathophysiology, clinical implications and modification by the anaesthetic technique. Clinical Intensive Care 1998; 9: 3, 118 – 128.

Chen X, Tang J, White PF, Vender RH Sloninsky A, Karigen R. A. comparison of patient state index and bispectal index values during perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2002; 95; 1669.

Pavlin JD, Colley PS, Weymuller EA Jr, Van Norman G, Gunn HC, Koerschgen ME. Propofol versus isoflurane for endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 1999; 20: 96-101.

Eberhart LH, Foiz BJ, Wulf H, Geldner G. Intravenous anesthesia provides optimal surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2003;113;1369-73.

H. J. Ahn, S. K. Chung, H. J. Dhong, H.Y.Kim, J.H. Ahn, S.M. Lee, T.S. Hahmand J.K. Kim. Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery, Br. J Anaesth, 2008 Jan;100(1):50-4.

Mishra LD, Pradhan SK, Pradhan CS. Comparison of propofol based anaesthesia to conventional inhalational general anaesthesia for spine surgery. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:59-61

Gan TJ, Glass PSA, Howell ST et al. Determination of plasma concentration associated with 50% reduction in postoperative nausea. Anesthesiology 1997; 87; 779.

Downloads

Published

2011-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Chavda NK, Thakur D, Goswami M, Chauhan Y, Shah H. Evaluation Of Intravenous Propofol Anesthesia and Traditional Inhalational Anesthesia in Mastoid Surgery. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 May 3];2(02):318-9. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1908

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 02 (2011)

Section

Original Research Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.