Comparative Evaluation of Robinson’s Cytological Grading with Elston and Ellis’ Nottingham Modification of Bloom Richardson Histopathology Grading for Breast Carcinoma


  • Amrish N Pandya Government Medical College, Surat
  • Neelam P Shah Government Medical College, Surat


breast cancer, FNAC, Elston and Ellis’s Nottingham modification of Bloom-Richardson method, infiltrating ductal carcinoma, mammary carcinoma, Robinson’s cytology grading


Background: Cytological grading of mammary carcinoma provides useful information about prognosis. It also helps in selecting therapy. Aim: This study has been carried out to compare correlation of Robinson’s cytological grading with modified Bloom Richardson grading system of infiltrating ductal carcinoma in histology.

Material and method: 59 FNAC smears of, invasive breast carcinoma, were graded according to the Robinson’s grading system. Corresponding histology sections were graded according to Elston and Ellis’ Nottingham modification of Bloom Richardson method.

Result: On cytology, there were 24, 26 and 9 cases of grade I, II and III tumor respectively while on histology 25, 24 and 10 cases of grade I, II and III tumor respectively. The concordance rate between cytology and histology grades were 79.16%, 73.07% and 66.66% for grade I, II and III tumor respectively. Absolute concordance rate was 74.57%.

Conclusion: Apart from being simple and non-invasive, cytologic grading method is comparable with histologic grading system. It might provide information about aggressiveness of tumor and is useful parameter while selecting neo adjuvant chemotherapy in patients of breast carcinoma.


Agarwal G, Ramakant P. Breast Cancer Care in India: The current scenario & the challenges for future. Breast Care (Basel). 2008; 3(1): 21-7.

Shahla Masood. Assessment of prognostic factor in breast FNA: Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 113 (suppl 1), s84-s96

Khan,N., Afroz, N., Rana,F., Khan, M.A. Role of cytologic grading in prognostication of invasive breast carcinoma: journal of cytology. 2009;26(2):65-8

Lingegowda, JB, MuddeGowda, PH, Ramakantha CK, Chandrasekar, HR. Cytohistological correlation of grading in breast carcinoma. Diagn. Cytopathol.2011; 39: 251–7.

Elston CW, Ellis IO.Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer: I: The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology.1991; 19: 403–10.

Dabbs DJ. Prognostic information from fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 May; 113(5 Suppl 1):S76-83.

Svante R.Orell, Gregory F. Sterrett, Darrel Whitaker. Fine needle aspiration cytology. 4th ed. New Delhi: Reed Elsevier India Private Limited, 2005:148.

Yu GH, Cajulis RS, DeFrias DVS. Tumor cell (dys) cohesion as a prognostic facto in aspirate smears of breast carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109 ;315-9.

Yu, G. H., Lawton, T. J., Pasha, T. L. and Reynolds, C.Intercellular adhesion molecule expression in ductal carcinoma of the breast. Diagn. Cytopathol, 2000; 23: 73–76.

Antonio RF, Ricardo GC, Diego MP, Maria Jose, et al. Robinson cytologic grading of invasive ducal breast carcinoma correlation with histologic grading system and regional lymph node metastasis. Acta cytol 2005; 49:149-53.

Wani FA, Bhardwaj S, Kumar D, Katoch P. Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems. J of Cytology.2010; 27(2):55-8.

Das AK, Kapila K, Dinda AK, Verma K. Comparative evaluation of grading of breast carcinomas in find needle aspirates by two methods. Indian J Med Res 2003; 118:247-50.

Ruibal A, Arias JI. Histologic grade in breast cancer: association with clinical and biological features in a series of 229 patients. Int J Biol Markers 2001;16;56-61.

Thike Aa,Chng MJ. Immunohistochemical expression of hormone receptors in invasive breas carcinoma:correlation of results of H-score with pathological parameters. Pathology 2001; 33:21-5.

Vidhi bhargava, Manjula Jain, Kiran Agarwal, Thomas S, Smita singh.Critical appraisal of cytological nuclear grading in carcinoma of breast and its correlation with ER/PR expression. Journal of cytology 2008;25(2):58-61.

Abati A, Abele J, Bacus SS, Bedrossian C, Beerline D, Bibbo M, et al. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997; 16(4):295-311.

I.A. Robinson, G. McKee, A. Nicholson, P.A. Jackson, M.G. Cook, J. D'Arcy, et al. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. Lancet.1994; 343: 947–9.

Chhabra S, Singh PK, Agarwal A, Bhagoliwal A, Singh SN: Cytological grading of breast carcinoma - A multivariate regression analysis. Journal of Cytology 2005; 22(2):62-5.

TS Rekha, NM Nandini, Murali Dhar. Validity of Different Cytological Grading Systems of Breast Carcinoma - a Hospital-based Study in South India. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 12, 3013-16.

Sinha SK, Sinha N, Bandyopadhyay R, Mondal SK (2009). Robbinson’s Cytological grading on aspirates of breast Carcinoma: Correlation with Bloom Richardson’s histological grading, J Cytol. 26; 4: 140-3.




How to Cite

Pandya AN, Shah NP. Comparative Evaluation of Robinson’s Cytological Grading with Elston and Ellis’ Nottingham Modification of Bloom Richardson Histopathology Grading for Breast Carcinoma. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2012 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Jun. 23];3(03):491-5. Available from:



Original Research Articles