A Study on Quality of Work Life Among Nurses in A Medical College Hospital in Bangalore

Authors

  • Naveen Ramesh St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, India
  • Catherine Nisha St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, India
  • Andre Mary Josephine St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, India
  • Seena Thomas St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, India
  • Bobby Joseph St. John’s Medical College, Bangalore, India

Keywords:

quality of work life, nurses, hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of Work Life (QWL) is defined as the extent to which an employee is satisfied with personal and working needs through participating in the workplace while achieving the goals of the organization.

Objectives: To assess the quality of life of nurses working in a medical college hospital in Bangalore and the factors associated with it.

Methods: Ethical approval from the institution and informed consent from the study participants was obtained and quality of life questionnaire was administered to all the nurses working in the hospital.

Results: A total of 671 (88.5%) nurses participated in the study. Among the participants, 452 (67.7%) indicated that they have the autonomy to make patient care decisions, 500 (74.9%) were unable to balance their work and family lives, 656 (98.2%) were stressed in their work and 543 (81.3%) of nurses were unable to complete their work in the time available.

Conclusion: It is important to consider the quality of working life of the nurses to improve productivity and performance of the nurses.

References

Hsu MY, Kernohan G. Dimensions of hospital nurses, quality of working life. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006; 54 (1): 120-131.

G Nasi Saraji, H Dangali. Study of quality of work life. Iranian Journal of Public Health 2006; 35(4): 8-14.

Dargahi H, Yazdi MK. Quality of work life in Tehran University of medical sciences hospitals’ clinical la-boratories employees. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sci-ence 2007; 23(1): 630 - 633.

Shalini Sheel, Sunil Pathak. Quality of work life, em-ployee performance and career growth opportunities: A literature review. International Journal of multidisci-plinary research 2012; 2(2):291-300.

Work-Related Quality of Life Scale 2008. Copyright (C) Quality of working life Limited. WRQoLv22. Available at http://www.qowl.com/qowl_wrqol_scale.html

Brooks BA, Anderson MA. Nursing work life in acute care. Journal on nursing care 2004; 19(3):269–275.

Dargahi H, Gharib M, Goodarzi M. Quality of work life in nursing employees of Tehran University of Medical Sciences hospitals [Farsi]. The Journal Tehran Nursing and Midwifery 2007, 13(2):78–87.

Khani A, Jaafarpour M, Dyrekvandmogadam A. Quality of nursing work life. Journal of Clinical Diagno-sis Research 2008, 2(6):1169–1174.

Brooks BA, Storfjell J, Omoike O, et al. Assessing the quality of nursing work life. Nursing Administation 2007, 31(2):152–157.

Clarke P, Brooks B. Quality of nursing work life: Con-ceptual clarity for the future. Nursing Science 2010, 23(4):301–305.

Chan M, Luk A, Leong S, et al. Factors influencing Macae nurses’ intention to leave current employment. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2009, 18(6):893–901.

Kinni T: Why we work. Training 1998, 35(8):34–40.

Maslow A: Motivation and personality. London: Har-per and Row; 1987.

Al-Ahmadi H: Factors affecting performance of hos-pital nurses in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Interna-tional Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2009, 22(1):40–54.

Day G: Nurse morale plummets in Queensland: Uni-versity of New England; 2005. PhD Thesis.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Ramesh N, Nisha C, Josephine AM, Thomas S, Joseph B. A Study on Quality of Work Life Among Nurses in A Medical College Hospital in Bangalore. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2013 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];4(03):471-4. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1557

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles