Consanguineous Marriages and Reproductive Behavior: A Study from Vidarbha Region of Maharashtra

Authors

  • Venkatramana K Sonkar Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Govt Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra
  • Uday W Narlawar GMC, Nagpur
  • Ismail Ali F Inamdar Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Govt Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra
  • Mohan K Doibale Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Govt Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra

Keywords:

consanguineous marriage, parental consanguinity, reproductive outcome

Abstract

Introduction: India has been subdivided in to two major regions with respect to a preference for or avoidance of consanguineous marriage. The deleterious health effects associated with consanguinity are caused by the expression of rare, recessive genes inherited from common ancestors.

Objectives: To find out the prevalence and types of consanguinity and reproductive behaviour in rural area of Nagpur district.

Methodology: study design: cross sectional study. Setting: Raipura village, a field practise area of Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur. Study population: married couples.

Result: The prevalence of consanguineous marriage in study couple was 16.43%. Most prevalent type of consanguineous marriage was seen in mother’s brother’s daughter type (73.04%). Significant association found in study couples and consanguinity in their parents. No significant effect of consanguinity was observed on foetal loss, neonatal mortality but significant association was found with congenital malformations.

Conclusion: Consanguineous marriages are still favourable in this region.

References

Ruffer MA. On the physical effects of consanguineous marriages in the royal families of ancient Egypt. Sec-tion of the history of medicine.145-190.

Bittles AH. The role of consanguinity as a demo-graphic variable. Population and Development review 1994; 20(3):561-584.

Bittles AH. A background summary of consanguine-ous marriage. Centre for Human Genetics, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia WA6027.2001:10.

Bittles AH. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet 2001; 60:89-98.

Bittles AH. Endogamy, consanguinity and communi-ty genetics. Journal of Genetics 2002; 81(3):91-97.

Shah DN. Consanguineous marriage and Indian laws. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 1993;XVIII(1):8-13.

Bittles AH, Mason WM, Greene J, Appaji Rao N. Re-productive behaviour and health in consanguineous Marriages. Science, New Series, 1991; 252(5007):789-794.

Banerjee SK, Roy TK. Parental consanguinity and offspring mortality: The search for possible linkage in the Indian context. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 2002; 17(1):17-38.

Rao PSSS, Inbaraj SG. Trends in human reproductive wastage in relation to long-term practise of inbreed-ing. Ann Hum Genet., Lond. 1979; 42:401-413.

Reddy PH, Modell B. Consanguinity and reproductive behaviour in tribal population ‘the Baiga’ in Madhya Pradesh, India. Annals of Human Biology 1995; 22(3):235-246.

Bittles AH, Coble JM, Appaji Rao N. Trends in con-sanguineous marriage in Karnataka, South India, 1980-89. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1993; 25:111-116.

Agarwal SS, Singh U, Singh PS, Singh SS, Das V, Sharma A et al. Prevalence & spectrum of congenital malformations in a prospective study at a teaching hospital. Indian J Med Res 1991; 94(B):413-419.

Metgud CS, Naik VA, Mallapur MD. Consanguinity and Pregnancy Outcome among Rural Pregnant Women of Belgaum District. Natl J Community Med. 2012;3(4):681-4.

Hamamy H, Jamhawi L, Al-Darawsheh J, Ajlouni K. Consanguineous Marriages in Jordan: Why is the rate changing with time? Clin Genet 2005; 67: 511-516.

Khoury SA, Massad D. Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. Am J Med Genet. 1992; 43: 769-775.

Reddy BKC, Reddy CS. Demographic profile of Yadavas- A backward caste population of Andhra Pradesh. Anthropologist 2006; 8(3): 167-169.

Kerkeni E, Monastiti K, Saket B, Guediche MN, Ben Cheikh H. Interplay of socio-economic factors, con-sanguinity, fertility and offspring mortality in Mo-nastir, Tunisia. Croat Med J. 2007; 48(5): 701-707.

Nath A, Patil C, Naik VA. Prevalence of consanguin-eous marriages in a rural community and its effect on pregnancy outcome. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2004; XXIX(1):41-43.

Mumtaz G, Tamim H, Kanaan M, Khawaja M, Kho-gali M, Wakim G et al. Effect of consanguinity on birth weight for gestational age in a developing coun-try. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165(7): 742-752.

Hamamy HA, Masri AT, Al-Hadidy AM, Ajlouni KM. Consanguinity and genetic disorders. Profile from Jordan. Saudi Med J. 2007; 28(7): 1015-1017.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-12

How to Cite

1.
Sonkar VK, Narlawar UW, Inamdar IAF, Doibale MK. Consanguineous Marriages and Reproductive Behavior: A Study from Vidarbha Region of Maharashtra. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 12 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];4(03):433-8. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1549

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles