Behavioral And Fertility Factors Associated with Acceptance or Non-Acceptance of Tubectomy

Authors

  • Devidas T Khedkar Dr DY Patil Medical College, Pune
  • Sushil Dalal Dr DY Patil Medical College, Pune
  • Jitendra S Bhawalkar Dr DY Patil Medical College, Pune
  • Jyoti A Landge Dr DY Patil Medical College, Pune

Keywords:

Respondent, Acceptor, Non-acceptor, Eligible couple, Tubectomy

Abstract

Background: Very rapidly growing current population is one of the major social problems in India. Tubectomy is the most commonly used contraceptive since its introduction in the National Family Planning Programme. Some eligible women accept this method and others do not, this study is trying to probe that.

Objective: The present study was conducted with an objective to study and compare the determinants of differential behaviour and some fertility factors in acceptors and non-acceptors of tubectomy.

Materials and Methods: It’s an observational, analytical, case control study; for which data is collected through direct interviews with study subjects by trained staff in structured and pretested proforma. The statistical variables used were means and ‘p’ Value of Chi square test obtained by subjecting data to ‘epi-info’ software.

Results: The average number of total living children, sons and daughters per acceptor were found to be 2.29, 1.35 and 0.94 respectively and for non acceptors; they were 2.20, 0.85 and 1.35 respectively.

Conclusions: Highly significant associations were observed between the number of sons and acceptance of tubectomy and the number of daughters and non-acceptance of tubectomy.

References

K Park. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medi-cine, 22nd ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2013. p 441-79.

Census India 2011, Population distribution in India by states. Available at: Census_ AffairsCloud.xls [Com-patibility Model] Micrsoft Excel. Accessed on February 7, 2016

Provisional Population Totals: India: Census 2011. Available at: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov- re-sults/indiaatglance.html. Accessed on February 7, 2016

United Nations. Factsheet, Population Division, De-partment of Economic and Social Affairs, World Popu-lation Prospects: The 2015 Revision. Suggested citation: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, DVD Edition. Accessed on February 20, 2016

US Census Bureau, Demographic Internet Staff. "International Programs - Information Gateway - U.S. Census Bureau". Census.gov. Retrieved 2011-09-24. Accessed on: February 20, 2016

Sunder Lal, Adarsh, Pankaj. Text Book of Community Medicine (Preventive and Social Medicine), 4th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors Pvt Ltd; 2014. P 73-111.

National Population Policy 2000. National Commission on Population, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi. Available at: http://populationcommission. nic.in/PublicationDetails/11_984_1.aspx. Accessed on: March 3, 2016

National Family Health Survey (NFHS 3) 2005-06. Key findings. Ministry of Health and Family welfare, Gov-ernment of India, New Delhi. Suggested citation: Inter-national Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2007. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06,India: Key Findings. Mumbai: IIPS. Accessed on: March 3, 2016

Demographics of India. From Wikipedia, the free ency-clopedia (Redirected from Indian census). Available at: file:///D:/Downloads/Demographics%20of%20India%20. Accessed on: March 4, 2016

Annual Report 2014-15. Chapter 9, Family Planning. Department of Health & Family Welfare, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India. Availa-ble at: www.mohfw.nic.in. Accessed on: March 4, 2016

Sujata K. Murarkar, S. G. Soundale, R.N. Lakade. Study of contraceptive practices and reasons for not accepting contraceptives in rural India: Chanai village as a case study. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2011; 4 (8):915-16

Avisek Gupta et al. Determinants of Contraceptive Practices Among Eligible Couples of Urban Slum in Bankura District, West Bengal. J Family Med Prim Care 2014;3(4): 388–92

Dutta PK, Vaz LS, Singh H. Socio-demographic profile of tubectomy acceptors -- an Army experience. Journal of Family Welfare 1990;36(1):56-60.

Raj A, Saggurti N, Balaia D, Silverman JG. Prevalence of child marriage and its effect on fertility and fertility-control outcomes of young women in India: A cross-sectional, observational study. Lancet 2009;373(9678):1883-9.

K Park. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medi-cine, 22nd ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2013. p 544.

The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Department), The Gazette of India 2007. Government of India, New Delhi. Avaail-able at: http://ncw.nic.in/acts/pcma2006.pdf. Ac-cessed on: March 10, 2016

Census 2011. Data on Marital Status & Fertility & Head of Household Released. Available at: http://pib.nic.in/ newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=119871. Accessed on: March 10, 2016

Parveen A, Gaash B, Ahmad D. Changes in Health Status of Women: A Comparative Analysis of NFHS Data. Indian Journal for the Practising Doctor; Vol. 5, No. 1 (2008-03 - 2008-04) http://www.indmedica.com/journals.php? jour-nalid=3&issueid=124&articleid=1645&action=article

Yogita P Pandya, Dinesh J Bhanderi. Epidemiological study of child marriages in a rural community of Guja-rat. Indian journal of community Medicine 2015;40(4):246-251 http://www.ijcm.org.in/article.asp?issn=0970-

National Family Health Survey-3 (2005-06). Fact sheet for India and J&K: IIPS, Mumbai. Available At: www.nfhsindia.org. Accessed on: March 7, 2016

National Family Health Survey-4, 2015-16. Fact sheet Maharashtra: IIPS, Mumbai. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Available at: http://rchiips .org /nfhs/pdf/NFHS4/Maharashtra.pdf. Accessed on: March 7, 2016

Sachin Mumbare, Shriram Gosavi, Balaji Almale, Aruna Patil, Supriya Dhakane, Aniruddha Kadu. Trends in av-erage living children at the time of terminal contracep-tion: A time series analysis over 27 years using ARIMA (p, d, q) non seasonal model 2014;39(4):223-228.

Ruchi Kalra, Sameer Phadnis, Ankur Joshi. Perceptual analysis of women on tubectomy and other family plan-ning services: a qualitative study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gyne-cology 2015;4(1):94-99.

Joshi V, Saroja K. Fertility and adoption of tubectomy among rural women. Journal of Family Welfare 1988;34(3):57-63.

Priyanka Chintaram Sahu, Ismail ali Farukh ali Inam-dar, Mohan K. Doibale. Contraceptive practices: an ex-perience from ever married women in a city of Maha-rashtra, India. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;4(2):349-54.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Khedkar DT, Dalal S, Bhawalkar JS, Landge JA. Behavioral And Fertility Factors Associated with Acceptance or Non-Acceptance of Tubectomy. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2016 Apr. 30 [cited 2024 May 2];7(04):325-30. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/930

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles