Influence Of Digital Gaming on Relationship and Social Health


  • Anganabha Baruah Amity University, Noida, India



Technology, Relationship, Digitalization, social media, digital native


The transition from the stone age to the digital era has radically altered our way of life. No matter their socioeconomic status, everyone around us currently has a mobile device. Immediately, we want to speak with someone, and within a second, we do. Facebook, Instagram, and online games simplify our daily lives, leaving little room for interpersonal relationships. This paper will examine how digitization has affected our interpersonal connections and also changed the way we view relationships from a social/mental health viewpoint. Since technology has lessened the necessity for social interaction, does this imply that we have all become digital natives? To gain a deeper understanding of the topic, this paper proposes a novel perspective supported by prior research. Since this problem has not been substantially investigated, more targeted research is required in the Indian setting.


Homans GC. Social behavior: its elementary forms. Rev. Ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovisch, Inc.1974.

Byrne D, Ervin C, & Lamberth J. Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. J Pers Soc Psychology.1970; 16:157. Doi:

Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook 'friends': Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. J Comp‐Medi Comm, 2007; 12: 1143. Doi:

Walther JB. Selective self‐presentation in computer‐mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, lan-guage and cognition. Comp Human Beh 2007; 23: 2538. Doi:

Turkle S. Alone together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books. 2011.

Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. The evolutionary origins of friendship. Ann Rev Psycho 2012; 63:153-1. Doi: PMid:21740224

Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Friendship and natural selection. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014; 111:10796. Doi: PMid:25024208 PMCid:PMC4113922

Mukerjee S. An empirical analysis of the association between social interaction and self-rated health. Am J of Health Promo 2013; 27: 231-4. Doi: PMid:23448412

Tay L, Tan K, Diener E, Gonzalez E. Social relations, health behaviors, and health outcomes: A survey and synthesis. App Psychol: Health Well-Being 2013; 5:28-1. Doi: PMid:23281315

Hertlein KM. Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Fam Rel 2012; 61: 374. Doi:

Hertlein KM, Blumer ML. The Couple and Family Technology Frame-work: Intimate relationships in a digital age. New York: Brunner-Routledge. 2014.

Hand MM, Thomas D, Buboltz WC, Deemer ED, & Buyanjargal M. Facebook and romantic relationships: Intimacy and couple sat-isfaction associated with online social network use. Cyberpsychol, Beh Soc Net 2013; 16: 8. Doi: PMid:23101932

Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Bowker, JC. Children in peer groups. In Bornstein, L.R. & Leventhal, M.H. Handbook of child psychol-ogy and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes in developmental systems. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. 2015. Doi: PMCid:PMC7837140

Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2010. Retrieved from: _Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf.

Barth D. Psychodynamic importance of "cyber" and "in the flesh" friends in psychotherapy with college-aged adolescents with eating disorders. J of Inf, Child Adolesc Psychother, 2016; 15: 357-4. Doi:

Smyth R, Nielsen I, Paritski O. A Minority-status Perspective on Intergroup Relations: A Study of an Ethnic Chinese Population in a Small Italian Town. Urb Studies 2007; 49: 307-2. Doi:

Décieux JP, Heinen A, Willems H. Social Media and Its Role in Friendship-driven Interactions among Young People: Mix Meth Study.2018; 27:18-1. Doi:

Utz S, Jonas KJ, Tonkens E. Effects of passion for massively multiplayer online role-playing games on interpersonal relation-ships. J Med Psychol 2012; 24: 77-2. Doi:

Achab S, Nicolier, M, Mauny, F. Massively multiplayer online role-playing games: comparing characteristics of addict vs non-addict online recruited gamers in a French adult population. BMC Psychiatry, 2011;11:144-1. Doi: PMid:21871089 PMCid:PMC3176476

Rose A, Asher SR. The Social Tasks of Friendship: Do Boys and Girls Excel in Different Tasks? Child Dev Perspec 2016; 11:3-1. Doi:

Newcomb TM. An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psycholog Rev 1953; 60: 393-6. Doi: PMid:13112341

Schoen R, Wooldredge J. Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia. J Marriage Fam, 1989; 51:465. Doi:

Campbell K, Holderness N, Riggs M. Friendship chemistry: An examination of underlying factors. Soc Science J. 2015; 52: 239-2. Doi: PMid:26097283 PMCid:PMC4470381

Fehr B. Friendship formation. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation New York: Psy-chology Press. 2008. pp.29-54.

Molloy LE, Gest SD, Rulison KL. Peer influences on academic motivation: Exploring multiple methods of assessing youths' most "influential" peer relationships. The J Early Adolesc 2011; 31: 13-1. Doi:

Blansky D, Kavanaugh C, Boothroyd C, Benson B, Gallagher J, Endress J. et al. (2013). Spread of academic success in a high school social network. 2013; PLoS ONE, 8:2. Doi: PMid:23418483 PMCid:PMC3572170

Lynch AD, Lerner RM, Leventhal T. Adolescent academic achievement and school engagement: An examination of the role of school-wide peer culture. J Youth Adolesc 2013; 42: 6-1. Doi: PMid:23076767

Montoya RM, Horton RS. A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. J Soc Pers Relation 2013; 30: 64-1. Doi:

Vissa B. Agency in action: Entrepreneurs' networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Org Science 2012; 23: 492-2. Doi:

Williams K, O'Reilly C. Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res Org Beh 1998; 20: 77.

Thibaut JW, Kelley HH. The social psychology of groups. Oxford, England: John Wiley. 1959.

Hatfield E, Traupmann J, Sprecher S, Utne M., Hay M. Equity in close relationships. In Ickes W.J. (Ed.), Compatible and Incompati-ble Relationships. New York: Springer. 1985.

Walker BH, Abel N, Anderies, J.M, Ryan P. Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Eco and Society 2009; 14:1. Doi:

Molm LD, Takahashi N, Peterson G. In the eye of the beholder: Procedural justice in social exchange. Am Sociol Rev 2003; 68: 128-1. Doi:

Mitchelll CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW, Burd NA, Breen SK, Phillips SM. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol 2012; 113:71-1. Doi: PMid:22518835 PMCid:PMC3404827

Leonidou LC, Talias MA, Leonidou CN. Exercised power as a driver of trust and commitment in cross-border industrial buyer-seller relationships. Indust Mark Manage 2008; 37: 92. Doi:

Cook K. Charting futures for sociology: Structure and actions. Cont Sociol. 2000; 29: 685. Doi:

Whitty MT, Carr AN. Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006. Doi:




How to Cite

Baruah A. Influence Of Digital Gaming on Relationship and Social Health. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2022 Oct. 31 [cited 2022 Dec. 9];13(10):733-7. Available from:



Review Articles