Women’s Knowledge, Perceptions, And Potential Demand Towards Caesarean Section
Keywords:
Caesarean section, perceptions, mode of deliveryAbstract
In today’s situation when the access to obstetric care is growing day by day there has been a concern over the rising caesarean rates over the world. A cross-sectional study was undertaken with an objective to determine the level of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about CS among pregnant women. All pregnant women, attending antenatal clinic, were interviewed with a structured questionnaire. Data analysis was done by using Epi info software. Of the total 247 women, participated in this study, the potential demand for CS was low and majority of women preferred vaginal delivery (91.5%). The majority of women (65.1%) were found to have very little knowledge. Overall, women preferring caesarean birth were multiparous (P<0.05), and were more likely to have had previous caesarean delivery (P<0.001), but there were otherwise no differences in age, parity, income, or education. However, most are still in favor of CS if it is necessary to protect their health or that of their infant. Study also revealed that there is need to provide better information for pregnant women during the antenatal period about modes of delivery, their indications, advantages and adverse consequences which will enable them to make an informed decision.
References
Gita, A.Caesarean section: Evaluation, guidelines and recommendations.Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008;5(3).
Naymi RS, Rehan N. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in a Teaching Hospital of Pakistan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 20:479-83.
International Institute for Population Sciences and ORC Macro, Report of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-III).2006; Mumbai: IIPS.
Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BWC. High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2003; 110(22):106-11.
Bhasin SK, Rajoura OP, Sharma AK, Metha M, Gupta N, Kumar S, & Josh ID.A High Prevalence of Caesarean Section Rate in East Delhi. Indian Journal of Community Medicine.2007; 32(3).
Coulter A, Parsons S, Askham J. Where Are the Patients in Decision- Making About Their Own Care? 2008; Copenhagen,Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
NLumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu MA, Souza PJ, Taneepanichskul, S, & Ruyan P. (2010). Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08, The Lancet, Published online January 12, 2010. 375(9713), 490 – 499.
Jukelevics N,VBAC.com.The Emotional Scars of Cesarean Birth. 2001; http://www.obgyn.net/pb/ articles/emotional_cs_scar.htm.
Sufang, G., Padmadas, S. S., Fengmin, Z., Brown, J. J., & Stones, R. W. (2007). Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China: Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85, 755–762.
Lei H, Wen SW, Walker M. Determinants of caesarean delivery among women hospitalized for childbirth in a remote population in China. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003; 25: 937-43.
Adageba RK, Danso KA, Adusu A & Ankobea F. Awareness and Perceptions of and Attitudes towards Caesarean Delivery among Antenatal. Ghana Med J. 2008; 42(4): 137–140.
Aali BS & Motamedi B.Women’s knowledge and attitude towards modes of delivery in Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2005; Vol. 11(4): 663-72
Aziken M, Omo-Aghoja L, Okonofua F. Perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women towards caesarean section in urban Nigeria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86(1): 42–47.
Angeja AC, Washington AE, Vargas JE, Gomez R, Rojas I, Caughey AB. Chilean women’s preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?. BJOG. 2006; 113(11): 1253–1258.
Pregnant Women Show an Amazing Lack of Knowledge about Childbirth Options, this Los Angeles Times article, http: //www.latimes.com/health/ boostershots/la-heb-childbirth.
Deber R, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156:1414–1420.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.