Women’s Attitude for a Male Offspring and Related Family Planning Practices
Keywords:
family planning, contraception, gender preference, contraceptive choices, male offspringAbstract
Background: Son preference in India is widespread and deep rooted. Parents’ expectations of benefits and costs are biased in favour of sons. This therefore acts as the key motivation for the preference of male offspring. Women might continue to bear children until the desired number of sons is reached.
Methodology: A community based, cross-sectional study was carried out among 718 married women of reproductive age group selected by systematic random sampling.
Results: The present study revealed that 63.1% women were of the opinion that it was necessary to have a male child. Women were more likely to be acceptors of contraception even if they had one son (38.8%) as compared to women having no sons (17.9%) and the relationship was found to be significantly associated. Women who accepted terminal method of contraception over spacing method was significantly higher among women having male offspring.
Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that in settings like Uttar Pradesh, focusing solely on family-size limitation may not be an effective strategy to promote family planning because it is women’s preference for sons – and not just family size – that plays a key role in determining if, when and how a woman regulates her fertility.
References
Bernhard N.Value of children and the framing of fertility: Results from a cross-cultural comparative survey in 10 soci-eties. European Sociological Review,2007;23, 5: 615-629.
Caldwell, John C, Reddy,Hemachandra P, Caldwell, Pat.The determinants of family structure in rural South In-dia. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1984;46( 1): 215-229.
Das Gupta, Monica: Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies 2003; 40(2): 153-187.
Probst, Wiebke: The missing women phenomenon in India: Causes and effects. Journal of Young Investigators 2009;19(17): 1-10.
Vlasoff, Carol. The value of sons in Indian village: How widows see it. Population Studies 1990; 44(1): 5-20.
Singh JP. The contemporary Indian family. In: Adams, Bernd N; Trost, Jan (Eds.): Handbook of world families. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications: 129-166, 2005.
Clark, Shelley 2000: Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. In: Demography 37, 1: 95-108.
Pande, Rohini P. 2003: Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunizationin rural India: The role of siblings. In: Demography 40,3: 395-418.
RetherfordRD, Roy TK. (2003) Factors Affecting Sex-Selective Abortion in India. Natl Fam Health Survey Bull 2003;17.
Sharma R,Mukherjee S. Comparative study of selected pa-rameters of gender discrimination in rural versus urban population of Ahmedabad, Gujarat. National journal of community medicine 2011 volume 2 Issue 1: p111-115.
National Family Health Survey-3(NFHS-3, 2005-06), chapter-5, Family Planning, 111-160.
Kansal A, Chandra R, Kandpal S D and Negi K S. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2005;30(2):60-62.
Aggarwal R K. Conventional and oral contraceptive users in rural Punjab. The Journal of Family Welfare 2005;51(2): 1-9.
Rajaretnam T and Deshpande R V. Factors inhibiting the use of reversible contraceptive methods in rural south In-dia, Studies in Family Planning,1994, 25(2):111-21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.
