Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) Among Patients at G.G. Hospital & Medical College, Jamnagar

Authors

  • Shirishkumar Patel Medical College Baroda, Vadodara
  • Pankajkumar P Taviad Medical College Baroda, Vadodara
  • Mala Sinha M P SHAH Govt. Medical College, Jamnagar
  • T B Javadekar Medical College Baroda, Vadodara
  • Vipul P Chaudhari Government Medical College, Surat

Keywords:

Urinary tract infections, Antibiotic susceptibility

Abstract

Background: It has been estimated that symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTI) occurs in as many as 7 million visits to emergency units and 100,000 hospitalizations annually. UTI has become the most common hospital-acquired infection, accounting for as many as 35% of nosocomial infections, and it is the second most common cause of bacteraemia in hospitalized patients.

Objective: (1) To detect the prevalence rate of bacterial infection among urinary isolates from patients having UTI. (2) To detect prevalence rate of drug resistance among pathogen isolate from patients having UTI.

Results: The prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) was evaluated in 3046 patients attending G.G. Hospital & Medical College, Jamnagar. Results showed 1416 (46.48%) patients were positive. The most common organisms were Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Proteus mirabilis. In-vitro antibiotic susceptibility tests revealed that the gram negatives bacteria were sensitive to quinolones (Gatifloxacin, levofloxacin) and meropenum, while the gram positive isolates were sensitive to linazolid, erythromycin & quinolones (Gatifloxacin, levofloxacin ).

Conclusion: The findings suggested the need for constant monitoring of susceptibility of specific pathogens in different populations to commonly used anti-microbial agents.

References

Naeem Akhtar., 2000. Urinary tract bacterial pathogens; their antimicrobial Susceptibility patterns at Bahawalpur. The Professional, 7(2):131-137.

Sklar, A H, Caruana , R J, Lammers, J E. and Strauser, G O., 1987. Renal infections in Autosomal polycystic kidney diseases. Am. J.Kidney Dis., 10: 81-88.

Acharya, VN, 1992. Urinary Tract infection – a dangerous & unrecognized foreunder of systemic sepsis. J. Post Grad Med., 38: 52-54.

Kass, E. H.: Bacteriuria and diagnosis of infections of urinary tract. Arch. Intern. Med., 100: 709-714, 1957.

National Committee for Clinical Lab Standards, Performance Standardization for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility test. 4th ed. Villanona PA. NCC 1993; DC M2 AS.

District laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries Monika Cheesbrough,2nd Edition 2006.

Koneman’s Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology,6th Edition 2005.

Savitha, T*., International Journal of Current Research Vol. 2, Issue, 1, pp. 067- 072, January, 2011

Mahesh El Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in a Tertiary Care Center in South India, Al Ame en J Med S c i (2 010 )3 (2 ) :1 2 0 -1 2 7

Azara S et al . J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2007; 19(1)

. Resistance pattern of urinary isolates in tertiary Indian hospital .

Kolawole et al International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences Vol 1. (5) pp.163-167, May, 2009. Prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTI) among patients attending Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital,Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Patel S, Taviad PP, Sinha M, Javadekar TB, Chaudhari VP. Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) Among Patients at G.G. Hospital & Medical College, Jamnagar. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2012 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];3(01):138-41. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1663

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles