Female Foeticide in Delhi/NCR: Exploring the Socio-Economic and Cultural Dimensions

Authors

  • Roumi Deb Amity Institute of Anthropology, Amity University, Noida
  • Bhatnagar P Amity Institute of Anthropology, Amity University, Noida
  • Avasthy D Amity Institute of Anthropology, Amity University, Noida

Keywords:

sex ratio, culture, socioeconomic status, dowry, infanticide, foeticide

Abstract

Background: The social and psychological fibres of India are predominantly patriarchal and contributing extensively to the secondary status of women. It is yet to be seen if the difference in attitudes towards the practice of female foeticide varies in different socio-economic strata, and in among the different communities of India.

Methodology: The present study is based on a door-to-door survey comprising 100 families, conducted in slum areas of Delhi/NCR. Most of the families living in these areas were immigrants from different states of India with different cultural practices and beliefs.

Results: Though the studied participants differed in their cultural perceptions on role and status of women in society, majority of them testified that the practice is more prevalent in the middle and upper class society, and escalating demands of dowry was cited as the main reason behind it. 

Conclusion: The extent of practice of female foeticide is seen to vary among different socio-economic strata and communities. Taking this diversity into consideration, customized social-awareness campaigns must be organized in accordance with different cultural and socioeconomic circumstances existing in the diverse range of communities in India. 

References

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Provisional Population Totals Paper 1 of 2011: NCT of Delhi, Chapter 3. Census of India Website: www.censusindia.gov.in; 2011.

Fathalla M. The missing millions. People Planet 1998; 7 (3).

Mills M and Begall K. Preferences for sex-composition of children in Europe: A multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child. Population Studies 2010; 64 (1): 77-95.

Wharton AS. The Sociology of Gender: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Second Edition, Sussex UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2012. p137.

Oomman N, Ganatra BR. Sex selection: the systematic elimination of girls. Reproductive Health Matters 2002; 10 (19): 184-8.

Kaur GB. Female foeticide: A danger to society. The Nursing Journal of India. 1996; 87 (4): 77-78

International Center for Research on Women. Son preference and daughter neglect in India: What happens to living girls?. International Center for Research on Women Website: http://www.icrw.org; 2006.

Roumi Deb. Khasis Reject Female Foeticide-Findings of a survey in 35 villages in East Khasi Hills District of Meghalaya. South Asian Social Anthropologists.2008; 8(2):159-164.

Preeti Rustogi. The Deprived, Discriminated & Damned Girl Child: The Story of Declining Child Sex Ratios in India. Women’s Health and Urban Life. 2006; 5(16)

Department of Women and Child Development. Identifying and Controlling Female Foeticide and Infanticide in Punjab. Chandigargh: Institute of Development and Communication; 2002.

Downloads

Published

2012-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Deb R, Bhatnagar P, Avasthy D. Female Foeticide in Delhi/NCR: Exploring the Socio-Economic and Cultural Dimensions. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2012 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Mar. 29];3(03):548-50. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1762

Issue

Section

Short Communication