Pulmonary Function Tests and Their Reversibility in Smokers

Authors

  • Ghanshyam B Borisagar PDU Government Medical College, Rajkot
  • Jayant B Chauhan GMERS Medical College, Sola, Ahmedabad

Keywords:

Pulmonary function tests, Smoking, Reversibility, Smoking duration, Smoking quantity

Abstract

Background: Smoking is known as the major cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) where most of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) especially those indicating the diameter of airways are reduced. In this study, PFTs of smokers were compared with those of nonsmokers, and the effect of bronchodilator inhaler (salbutamol) on PFTs of smokers was also examined.

Methods: Pulmonary function tests were measured in 97 male smokers and compared with 95 male nonsmokers. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory flow at 75%, 50%, and 25% of the FVC (MEF75, MEF50, and MEF25 respectively) were measured. In addition, pulmonary function tests of 33 male smokers before and 10 minutes after administration of 200 μg salbutamol inhaler were measured.

Results: Most values of PFTs in smokers were significantly lower than those of non-smokers (p<0.001 for FVC, FEV1, PEF, MEF75, p<0.01 for MMEF, and p<0.02 for MEF50). Significant correlations between the smoking duration and FEV1, PEF, MEF75, and MEF50 (p<0.05 to p<0.01) was found, but correlations between smoking quantity and values of PFTs were not significant. All values of PFTs were significantly increased after salbutamol administration (p<0.05 to p<0.01).

Conclusion: The profound effect of smoking on PFT showed that smoking leads to constriction of large and medium sized airways which is mostly due to duration not to quantity of smoking. The airway constriction in smokers was reversible which, was mostly seen for medium sized airways.

References

World Health Organization. World health report. Geneva: WHO; 2000.

Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy-- lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science 1996; 274(5288): 740-3.

Auerbach O, Hammond EC, Garfinkel L, Benante C. Relation of smoking and age to emphysema. Whole-lung section study. N Engl J Med 1972; 286(16): 853-7.

Lebowitz MD, Burrows B. Quantitative relationships between cigarette smoking and chronic productive cough. Int J Epidemiol 1977; 6(2): 107-13.

Burrows B, Knudson RJ, Cline MG, Lebowitz MD. Quantitative relationships between cigarette smoking and ventilatory function. Am Rev Respir Dis 1977; 115(2): 195- 205.

Seely JE, Zuskin E, Bouhuys A. Cigarette smoking: objective evidence for lung damage in teen-agers. Science 1971; 172(984): 741-3.

Nadel JA, Comroe JH Jr. Acute effects of inhibition of cigarette smoke on airway conduction. J ApplPhysiol 1961; 16: 713-6.

Hogg JC, Macklem PT, Thurlbeck MW. Site and nature of airway obstruction in chronic obstructive lung disease. N Engl J Med 1968; 278(25): 1355-60.

Berend N, Wright JL, Thurlbeck MW, Marlin GE, Woolcock AJ. Small airways disease: reproducibility of measurements and correlation with lung function. Chest 1981; 79(3): 263-8.

Wright JL, Lawson LM, Pare PD, Kennedy S, Wiggs B, Hogg JC. The detection of small airways disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 129(6): 989-94.

Standardization of spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society. Am J RespirCrit Car Med 1995; 152(3): 1107-36.

Zuskin E, Mitchell CA, Bouhuys A. Interaction between effects of beta blockade and cigarette smoke on airways. J Applphysiol 1974; 36(4): 449-52.

Lange P, Groth S, Nyboe GJ, Mortensen J, Appleyard M, Jensen G, Schnohr P. Effects of smoking and changes in smoking habits on the decline of FEV1. EurRespir J 1989; 2(9): 811-6.

Bosken CH, Wiggs BR, Pare PD, Hogg JC. Small airway dimensions in smokers with obstruction to airflow. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142(3): 563-70.

Eidelman DH, Ghezzo H, Kim WD, Hyatt RE, Cosio MG. Pressure-volume curves in smokers. Comparison with alpha- 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139(6): 1452-8.

Aparici M, Fernandez Gonzalez AL, Alegria E. Respiratory function tests. Differences between smokers and nonsmokers. Effects of withdrawal. Rev clinEsp 1993; 192(4): 169-72.

Nemery B, Moavero NE, Brasseur L, Stanescu DC. Changes in lung function after smoking cessation: an assessment from a cross -sectional survey. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 125(1): 122-4.

Lubinski W, Targowski T, Frank-Piskorska A. Evaluation of the influence of tobacco smoking on pulmonary function in young men. PneumonolAlergol pol 2000; 68(5-6): 226- 31.

Goodman RM, Yergin BM, Landa JF, Golivanux MH, Sackner MA. Relationship of smoking history and pulmonary function tests to tracheal mucous velocity in nonsmokers, young smokers, ex-smokers, and patients with chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978; 117(2): 205- 14.

Welty C, Weiss ST, Tager IB, Munoz A, Becker C, Speizer FE, Ingram RH Jr. The relationship of airways responsiveness to cold air, cigarette smoking, and atopy to respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in adults. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130(2): 198-203.

Sherrill DL, Lebowitz MD, Knudson RJ, Burrows B. Longitudinal methods for describing the relationship between pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms and smoking in elderly subjects: the Tucson Study. EurRespir J 1993; 6(3): 342-8.

Verschakelen JA, Scheinbaum K, Bogaert J, Demedts M, Lacquet LL, Baert AL. Expiratory CT in cigarette smokers: correlation between areas of decreased lung attenuation, pulmonary function tests and smoking history. EurRadiol1998; 8(8): 1391-9.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Borisagar GB, Chauhan JB. Pulmonary Function Tests and Their Reversibility in Smokers. Natl J Community Med [Internet]. 2014 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];5(01):122-5. Available from: https://njcmindia.com/index.php/file/article/view/1333

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles